Literary theory is the theory (or the philosophy ) of the interpretation of literature and literary criticism . Its history begins with classical Greek poetics and rhetoric and includes,since the 18th century , aesthetics and hermeneutics . In the 20th century , "theory" has become an umbrella term for a variety of scholarlyapproaches to reading texts, most of which are informed by various strands of Continental philosophy . (In much academic discussion, the terms "literary theory" and "Continentalphilosophy" are nearly synonymous, though some scholars would argue that a clear distinction can be drawn between the two.)
Literary theory and literature
One of the fundamental questions of literary theory is "What is literature ?", though many contemporary theorists and literary scholars believe either that the term "literature"is undefinable or that it can potentially refer to any use of language . Specifictheories are distinguished not only by their methods and conclusions, but even by how they define a "text." For some scholars ofliterature, "texts" means "books belonging to the literary canon ". Butthe principles and methods of literary theory have been applied to non-fiction, popular fiction, film, historical documents, law,advertising, etc., in the related field of cultural studies . Infact, some scholars within cultural studies treat cultural eventslike fashion, football, riots, etc. as "texts" to be interpreted. Taken broadly, then, literary theory can be thought of as thegeneral theory of interpretation.
Since theorists of literature often draw on a very heterogeneous tradition of Continental philosophy and the philosophy of language , any classification of their approaches is only an approximation. There aremany "schools" or types of literary theory, which take different approaches to understanding texts. Most theorists, even amongthose listed below, combine methods from more than one of these approaches (for instance, the deconstructive approach of Paul de Man drew on along tradition of close reading pioneered by the New Critics , and de Man was trained in the European hermeneutic tradition).
Broad schools of theory that have historically been important include the New Criticism , formalism , Russian formalism , and structuralism , post-structuralism , Marxism , feminism and French feminism , new historicism , deconstruction , reader-response criticism , and psychoanalytic criticism.
Schools of literary theory
Listed below are some of the most commonly identified schools of literary theory, along with their major authors. (In many ofthese cases, such as those of the historian and philosopher MichelFoucault and the anthropologist Claude Lévi-Strauss ,these authors were not literary critics and did not primarily write about literature; but, since their work has been broadlyinfluential in literary theory, they are nonetheless listed here.)
The practice of literary theory became a profession in the 20th century, but it has historical roots that run as far back asancient Greece (Longinus' On the Sublime is an often cited early example as is Aristotle 's Poetics), and the aesthetic theories of philosophers from ancient philosophy through the 18th and 19th centuries are important influences on current literary study. The theory and criticism of literature are, of course, also closely tied tothe history of literature .
The modern sense of "literary theory," however, dates only to approximately the 1950s ,when the structuralist linguistics of Ferdinand de Saussure began strongly to influence English language literary criticism. The New Critics and various European-influenced formalists (particularly the Russian Formalists ) had described some of their more abstract effortsas "theoretical" as well. But it was not until the broad impact of structuralism began to be felt in the English-speakingacademic world that "literary theory" was thought of as a unified domain.
In the academic world of England and America, literary theory was at its most popular from the late 1960s (when its influence was beginning to spread outward from elite universities like Johns Hopkins and Yale ) through the 1980s (by which time it was taught nearlyeverywhere in some form). During this span of time, literary theory was perceived as academically cutting-edge research, and mostuniversity literature departments sought to teach and study theory and incorporate it into their curricula. Because of itsmeteoric rise in popularity and the difficult language of its key texts, theory was also often criticized as faddish or trendyobscurantism (and many academic satire novels of the period, such as those by David Lodge , feature theory prominently). Some scholars, both theoretical and anti-theoretical, refer to the 1970s and 1980s debates on the academic merits oftheory as "the theory wars."
By the early 1990s , the popularity of "theory" as a subject of interest by itself wasdeclining slightly (along with job openings for pure "theorists") even as the texts of literary theory were incorporated into thestudy of almost all literature. Since then, and as of 2004 , the controversyover the use of theory in literary studies has all but died out, and discussions on the topic within literary and culturalstudies tend now to be considerably milder and less acrimonious. Some scholars draw heavily on theory in their work, while othersonly mention it in passing or not at all; but it is an acknowledged, important part of the study of literature.
Differences among schools
The intellectual traditions and priorities of the various kinds of literary theory are often radically different. Some differso strongly that even finding a set of common terms upon which to compare them is not a trivial effort.
For instance, the work of the New Critics often contained an implicitmoral dimension, and sometimes even a religious one: a New Critic might read a poem by T.S. Eliot or Gerard Manley Hopkins forits degree of honesty in expressing the torment and contradiction of a serious search for belief in the modern world. Meanwhile a Marxist critic might find such judgments merely ideological rather than critical; theMarxist would say that the New Critical reading did not keep enough critical distance from the poem's religious stance to be ableto understand it. Or a post-structuralist critic might simplyavoid the issue by understanding the religious meaning of a poem as an allegory of meaning, treating the poem's references to"God" by discussing their referential nature rather than what they refer to.
Such a disagreement cannot be easily resolved, because it is inherent in the radically different terms and goals (that is, thetheories) of the critics. Their theories of reading derive from vastly different intellectual traditions: the New Critic baseshis work on an East-Coast American scholarly and religious tradition, while the Marxist derives her thought from a body ofcritical social and economic thought, and the post-structuralist's work emerges from twentieth-century Continental philosophy oflanguage. To expect such different approaches to have much in common would be naive; so calling them all "theories of literature"without acknowledging their heterogeneity is itself a reduction of their differences.
For some theories of literature (especially certain kinds of formalism), the distinction between 'literary' and other sorts oftexts is of paramount importance. Other schools (particuarly post-structuralism in its various forms: new historicism,deconstruction, some strains of Marxism and feminism) have sought to break down distinctions between the two and have applied thetools of textual interpretation to a wide range of 'texts', including film, non-fiction, historical writing, and even culturalevents.
Another crucial distinction among the various theories of literary interpretation is intentionality, the amount of weightgiven to the author's own opinions about and intentions for a work. For most pre-20th century approaches, the author's intentionsare a guiding factor and an important determiner of the 'correct' interpretation of texts. The New Criticism was the first schoolto disavow the role of the author in interpreting texts, preferring to focus on "the text itself" in a close reading . In fact, as much contention as there is between formalism andlater schools, they share the tenet that the author's interpretation of a work is no more inherently meaningful than anyother.
literary theoy, new, lterary theory, criticism, literay theory, work, litreary theory, century, literary heory, scholars, literari theory, approaches, , reading, literary teory, structuralism, literray theory, isbn, literar theory, theorists, liteary theory, language, ilterary theory, history, litearry theory, important, lierary theory, academic, literary theor, author, ltierary theory, religious, literary theori, structuralist, literary thery, refer, literaryt heory, study, lietrary theory, historical, literry theory, listed, literary theroy, methods, literary tehory, robert, literary theoyr, references, literarytheory, world, literary thory, continental, literar ytheory, feminism, literary thoery, theoretical, literary hteory, terms, literayr theory, one, litrary theory, differences, iterary theory, authors
This article is completely or partly from Wikipedia - The Free Online Encyclopedia. Original Article. The text on this site is made available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation Licence. We take no responsibility for the content, accuracy and use of this article.